Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 11:15 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Therefore, I claim that the only reasonable choice is the first
>> extreme: we should assume that any game action not explicitly
>> permitted by the rules is forbidden, without needing any rule to tell
>> us this.
>>
>>     
> Or we could just use a little common sense. As reasonable thinking
> people, I suspect it would be easy for us to determine what should be
> regulated and what shouldn't be. Consider it an unwritten
> meta-guideline, but it only makes sense for the players of the game to
> act within the spirit of the rules on issues like this. There's plenty
> of other ways to run scams without having to resort to "I create 5000
> points for myself because I don't think it is regulated". We could
> squabble over this point for days (actually, I think we have), but in
> the end we all have to agree not to try and exploit this over and over
> again, otherwise I doubt we will have a very enjoyable time.
>
> BobTHJ
>   
If the last emergency teaches us something, it's METARULES ARE BAD, 
DON'T USE THEM.
Please someone propose something that makes it clear what kind of game 
we are playing.




_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss