Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation

[Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 02 December 2007 17:13:53 Justin Ahmann wrote:
> I consider the AFO to be a Player, but not Agora's Child.  The AFO is not 
> Agora's Child, and thus cannot register Agora's Child.  However, the AFO 
> (not pikhq) declared the AFO's intent to join, and thus I consider the AFO 
> to be a valid Player.   

The AFO is a member of Agora's Child, and one of two entities able to act on 
its behalf. Therefore, by the rules of Agora's Child, the AFO *can* do 
anything in the name of Agora's Child.

Also, the AFO was only announcing that Agora's Child intends to join.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss