| Antonio Dolcetta on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:31:54 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ? |
Please explain to me precisely why revising a Refresh Proposal is different. You are all saying that you can do things unless the rules don't explicitly prohibit something, I honestly don't see the difference. 0x44 wrote: > All the actions you performed are regulated. Consultations are answered > by a Priest and then a quorum of players determines whether or not the > answer is in accordance with the rules and previous consultations. The > value of the clock increases at 0:00 UTC. You cannot retract something > you haven't said. The Emergency Coordinator is the player last Minister > of Ministries. The Emergency period is determined by the number of panic > buttons. > > All of the actions you've taken are regulated by the rules, therefore > your actions are invalid. Further, you posted them to a non-public forum. :) > >> If so, I immediatley declare consultation 45 to be False and Pondered >> I set the clock to nday 1 nweek 135 nyear 14, Fourth era of B Nomic >> I retract all Current Refresh Proposals >> I declare myself the Emergency Coordinator >> I declare myself not the Emergency Coordinator >> I hereby immediately end the emergency procedure >> >> Welcome back to the game >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss