Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 30, 2007 10:21 AM, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2007 9:16 AM, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe you think they did, but rule 0 does not allow them to do it, so in
> >> fact they did not.
> >> Refresh Proposals are an unique kid of game document, so they don't fall
> >> under the usual mechanisms for normal Proposals.
> >> In the light of this interpretation, every Refresh Proposal that was
> >> submitted would be voted on in it's first, original version.
> >>
> >>
> > I think we have established by now that what is not regulated is
> > permitted. The rules make no reference to revising refresh proposals,
> > and in fact indicate that the emergency forum should be used for their
> > discussion. I see no issue with allowing players to revise/retract
> > their refresh proposals.
> >
> > BobTHJ
> >
> >
> If so, I immediatley declare consultation 45 to be False and Pondered
> I set the clock to nday 1 nweek 135 nyear 14, Fourth era of B Nomic
> I retract all Current Refresh Proposals
> I declare myself the Emergency Coordinator
> I declare myself not the Emergency Coordinator
> I hereby immediately end the emergency procedure
>
> Welcome back to the game
>
And all of those actions are regulated (thus not permitted) with the
exception of perhaps the third one.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss