Re: [s-d] [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

William Berard wrote:
> I'm just pointing at those kind of issues to stress out that if you are to
> implement a "quick vote" system (which in itself is not a bad idea, IMHO)
> that is distinct and independant from the main, scheduled voting system, you
> should try and come up with a more solid legislative framework, dealing with
> exceptions, quorums, special cases, and so on, as this is typically the kind
> of things that need to be rock-tight. But that's just my opinion.
>   
B nomic used to have a thing called referendum, to deal with this kind 
of issue, it worked quite well.
Maybe we could dig out the relevant rules from someone's archives and 
have a close look.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss