Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:05:20 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint


Rule 3-14 says "Any unique blueprint is put to auction immediately
upon creation."



On Nov 26, 2007 10:58 AM, William Berard <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/26/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 25, 2007 11:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > A)
> > > >
> > > > {{
> > > > Is it true that any player can define a blueprint?
> > > > }}
> > >
> > >
> > > This is Consultation Number 45 and I assign it to Priest Wooble.
> >
> > I answer YES.
> >
> > While the rules don't explicitly allow the creation of Blueprints
> > except by the Artisan, they don't forbid it, either.  Everyone who
> > voted to foolishly repeal the Monopoly Rule may kick themselves.
> >
> > I create the following unique Blueprint "How to scam the system":
> > {{
> > This blueprint can create the following unique device:
> >
> > Name: Staff of Winning
> > Trigger: nday 6 begins
> > Effect: All Players of Level 8 or above gain 260 points.  Then, the
> > Staff is destroyed.
> > }}
> >
> > I bid 1m for the "How to scam the system" blueprint.
>
>
>
>
> I do not think you can bid on blueprints. you can bid on devices, but I do
> not see much point in bidding on blueprints since it has been established in
> a recent consultation that no one can own a blueprint...
>
> Maybe you meant that you defined said blueprint, then went and asked the
> artisan to build the corresponding device, then subsequently state your
> intent to bid on said device, were it to be built by the artisan (can the
> artisan veto such a request?)
>
> On top of that, I see litte point in bidding on such an item since it will
> be triggered at the beginning of m6 and will affect all players of level 8
> or above. Bidding would make sense if you intended, as the owner of the
> device, to destroy it, but I am not quite sure what the rule state regarding
> this possibility...
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss