Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:30:39 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Right to fair judicial review |
Agreed. Billy Pilgrim On 11/22/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I submit the following proposal: > > Right to Fair Judicial Review > { > Amend rule 2-5 Judgment by replacing: > {{ > Any player may as a Game Action submit a Consultation. > }} > with > {{ > Any External Force may as a Game Action submit a Consultation. > }} > } > > Just because someone/something is denied playerhood should not prevent > them from submitting consultations to clarify the ambiguities in the > rules. Especially since there is a considerable amount of ambiguity > surrounding the rules that pertain to becoming a player. > > BobTHJ > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss