Re: [s-d] [s-b] Right to fair judicial review

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

If there is a legitimate problem in the rules which prevents someone
or something from becoming a Player, it can be resolved via the
Discussion forum and having an actual Player submit a Consultation. I
don't like the idea of giving non-Players, who by nature can't be
enforced by rules, the ability to "play" in the game.

- Hose

On 11/22/07, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
>
> On 11/22/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal:
> >
> > Right to Fair Judicial Review
> > {
> > Amend rule 2-5 Judgment by replacing:
> > {{
> > Any player may as a Game Action submit a Consultation.
> > }}
> > with
> > {{
> > Any External Force may as a Game Action submit a Consultation.
> > }}
> > }
> >
> > Just because someone/something is denied playerhood should not prevent
> > them from submitting consultations to clarify the ambiguities in the
> > rules. Especially since there is a considerable amount of ambiguity
> > surrounding the rules that pertain to becoming a player.
> >
> > BobTHJ
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss