Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure

Ed Murphy on Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:42:23 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:40:53 -0800
In-reply-to: <6d741b990711211418r753b394ctaff69902f88fd977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4743D9FD.1050307@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990711211418r753b394ctaff69902f88fd977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Hose wrote:

> Question. Is this an informal inquiry? I have not been assigned as a
> Priest (from what I can see), this was sent to a non-public forum, and
> while arguments are listed, I have to be Alex Trebeck and say they are
> not in the form of a question.

These are arguments related to Consultation 39, which Billy Pilgrim
submitted and assigned to you.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure
  - From: Mike McGann

References:
- [s-d] AFO disclosure
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] blueprints
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] AFO disclosure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread