Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: No More Membership Tests!

[Eugene Meidinger <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Obviously it should be set to pass without like 3 or 4 objections that
way a few people think it's a bad idea to stop it.

On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 05:57 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On 8/11/07, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In Rule 1-4, amend the third paragraph to read:
> > "An External Force may become a Player by posting a message to a Public
> > Forum containing a request to become a Player and a uniquely identifying
> > name that it wishes to be known by. Such a request shall take effect without
> > objection after 4 ndays (or ndelays if the clock is off). It may do this if
> > and only if it fulfills the following requirements:
> > -It is not currently a Player
> > -It has a working e-mail address"
> >
> > Repeal Rule 1-17.
> >
> > [[That way we can just shut down any attempt at becoming a player that seems
> > questionable, instead of arguing over membership tests.]]
> 
> It would also allow a single disgruntled player to reject legitimate
> new players.
> 

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss