Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:40:22 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: No More Membership Tests! |
On 8/11/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8/11/07, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In Rule 1-4, amend the third paragraph to read: > > "An External Force may become a Player by posting a message to a Public > > Forum containing a request to become a Player and a uniquely identifying > > name that it wishes to be known by. Such a request shall take effect > without > > objection after 4 ndays (or ndelays if the clock is off). It may do this > if > > and only if it fulfills the following requirements: > > -It is not currently a Player > > -It has a working e-mail address" > > > > Repeal Rule 1-17. > > > > [[That way we can just shut down any attempt at becoming a player that > seems > > questionable, instead of arguing over membership tests.]] > > It would also allow a single disgruntled player to reject legitimate > new players. > > Spot on, Geoffrey. It would also enforce a 4 nday delay on legitimate requests. Not very newcomer friendly, as when I sign up for a game it tends to be because I want to play. Now. Many people won't want to wait around for 4 days before getting to do anything, just to make sure everyone is OK with them playing. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss