Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: No More Membership Tests!

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx>]

To cut down the wait, let players approve as well as object; if  
enough players approve, then the new player joins immediately.

-- 
Wonko

On Aug 11, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Eugene Meidinger wrote:

> Obviously it should be set to pass without like 3 or 4 objections that
> way a few people think it's a bad idea to stop it.
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 05:57 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On 8/11/07, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> In Rule 1-4, amend the third paragraph to read:
>>> "An External Force may become a Player by posting a message to a  
>>> Public
>>> Forum containing a request to become a Player and a uniquely  
>>> identifying
>>> name that it wishes to be known by. Such a request shall take  
>>> effect without
>>> objection after 4 ndays (or ndelays if the clock is off). It may  
>>> do this if
>>> and only if it fulfills the following requirements:
>>> -It is not currently a Player
>>> -It has a working e-mail address"
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 1-17.
>>>
>>> [[That way we can just shut down any attempt at becoming a player  
>>> that seems
>>> questionable, instead of arguing over membership tests.]]
>>
>> It would also allow a single disgruntled player to reject legitimate
>> new players.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss