Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Priestly Indecision

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/11/07, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add the following text to Rule 2-5:
> "After a Priest answers a consultation assigned to them, but before it
> becomes pondered, they may change their ruling on that consultation. Doing
> this causes all claims regarding its consistency to be erased and the four
> nday waiting period before it becomes pondered to start over."

I like it, with the exception that it allows a priest to keep a
consultation in a pending state forever.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss