Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Priestly Indecision

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

I amend my proposal to read:
Add the following text to Rule 2-5:
"After a Priest answers a consultation assigned to them, but before it
becomes pondered, they may change their ruling on that consultation if they
have not already done so. Doing
this causes all claims regarding its consistency to be erased and the four
nday waiting period before it becomes pondered to start over."

2007/8/11, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 8/11/07, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add the following text to Rule 2-5:
> > "After a Priest answers a consultation assigned to them, but before it
> > becomes pondered, they may change their ruling on that consultation.
> Doing
> > this causes all claims regarding its consistency to be erased and the
> four
> > nday waiting period before it becomes pondered to start over."
>
> I like it, with the exception that it allows a priest to keep a
> consultation in a pending state forever.
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss