Daniel Lepage on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:21:50 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Ministries independent of the rules |
On 7/11/07, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The downside, I suppose, is that we couldn't have ministries with more > > complicated behavior. For example, the Ministry of the Force, long ago, > > bestowed a number of special Force Powers on its Minister; that required > > special rules. We don't want something to be defined both by a rule and > > by a separate object, either, because then we have loose ends if the > > Administrator dissolves the Ministry of the Force without touching the > > related rules. > > So, currently, additional powers granted to Ministers that I see are: > Rulekeeper: Assigning rule/section numbers and moving rules (r1-8) > Chairman: Assigning prop. numbers (r2-2) > Oracle: Assigning and numbering Consultations, zotting (r2-5) > Registrar: Accepting name changes (r1-4) > Rule Tag Moderator: Has powers/restrictions in Rule Tag (r4-4) > MoM: Setting state of Clock (r2-1) Perhaps we need two types of Ministries, legislated ones and unlegislated ones? Draft Rule: {{ === MiniMinistries === A MiniMinistry is a Ministry that is not explicitly defined by the rules. Any Minister of a MiniMinistry may be referred to as a MiniMin. The MetaMin may create a MiniMinistry at any time, specifying its name and its responsibilities. E may also dissolve any MiniMinistry at any time. }} > We already have loose ends in that particular ministries are tied to > powers in other rules. Really, each of our rules has connections to other > rules, such that changing one requires looking at everything else to see > what else might need to be changed. One of the reasons I think I prefer > the all-in-the-rules approach is that it's just one document to search for > related things, rather than needing to search everywhere. If we are going to keep it all in the ruleset, then I think each Ministry should be defined, along with its powers, in the appropriate section of the rules. I don't like having Ministries defined at the end of the ruleset when they're actually described at the beginning. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss