Re: [s-d] Oracle report

Roger Hicks on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:32:41 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Oracle report

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Oracle report
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:32:37 -0600
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0706211031s178fa7c3s65d8a44cdce90ad8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <467A2F21.4030501@xxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0706210926k128c01a3xb906cecb5b1d68cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200706211323.18838.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0706211031s178fa7c3s65d8a44cdce90ad8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I claim my ruling on Consultation #10 as Inconsistent as well. This is
in addition to the claims made below (this time to the public forum):

BobTHJ

On 6/21/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I was obviously far to hasty in issuing these rulings, my apologies.
> As a Game Action I hereby claim my rulings on Consultations #5 and #7
> to be Inconsistent.
>
> BobTHJ
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] Oracle report
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] Oracle report
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Action
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Game Action
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Oracle report
Next by thread: [s-d] Open Proposals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread