Roger Hicks on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:31:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Oracle report |
> The Game Object that is the player "comex" would be destroyed in the > hypothetical situation, therefore the fact that I am one is not an issue. > > The reason I called that consultation is that if indeed there was only one > Player, theoretically nothing could allow Players to communicate and > therefore there would be no valid forums for me to become a player in. > > I also call into question your judgement of consultation 7, as player != > outsider. PEPs, for example, are outsiders but can be not players. > I was obviously far to hasty in issuing these rulings, my apologies. As a Game Action I hereby claim my rulings on Consultations #5 and #7 to be Inconsistent. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss