Re: [s-d] panic

Antonio Dolcetta on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:08:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] panic

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] panic
From: Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:08:07 +0100
In-reply-to: <1171471601.11933.3.camel@eugene-laptop>
References: <808C2B14-0FEB-4924-A198-0AF34D4412BD@xxxxxxxxx> <u3b59inxt.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CB4CD01-0246-4B07-AC81-CD11BE5070AB@xxxxxxxxx> <200702132122.27615.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <45D32F82.1010908@xxxxxxxxx> <1171471601.11933.3.camel@eugene-laptop>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)

Eugene Meidinger wrote:
> Perhaps we could have some sort of committee.
> 

we had a committee in some previous version of the rules.
It didn't help much.
But the idea is interesting.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] panic
  - From: Eugene Meidinger

References:
- Re: [s-d] panic
  - From: Peter Cooper Jr.
- Re: [s-d] panic
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] panic
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] panic
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] panic
  - From: Eugene Meidinger

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] panic
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] panic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] panic
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] panic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread