shadowfirebird on Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:02:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Votes |
> [...] In particular, I do /not/ like the > idea of requiring a default owner - perhaps I want to make a Device > which anyone can magic up under the proper conditions; there's no > appropriate default owner to specify in the rules in that case. Perfectly good point. Wonko seems to have worked around this though in his zombie prop. > Moreover, it's not simply > 'owner' - what if I [or Crazy Eddie] sell this device to someone? ::sigh:: we're going around in circles, mate. "Owner" is the *current* owner. It says so in the "Devices" prop. I admit that I could have worded the "Crazy Eddie's stock" rule better, but that doesn't make the whole concept invalid. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss