shadowfirebird on Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:05:07 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] time defs proposal |
> Basically the problem is that everything we have is defined as starting > on nday X, or has to be done before the end of nday Y etc. > But nowhere is it actually explained when ndays start and end, or even > what and nday actually is. > What we have is just a number called nday that changes semi-regularly. Hmm. Personally I don't think that there is any lack of clarity. If I say "On nday 9" then there is only one possible interpretation of that - I mean on the UTC day when nday = 9. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss