Re: [s-d] [s-b] time defs proposal

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I think for dumb-asses like me (...maybe just for me!) you'd best
> spell out what the problem you are trying to resolve actually IS.
> IOW, what does this give us that we didn't have before?
> 
> Optional.


Sure,

Basically the problem is that everything we have is defined as starting 
on nday X, or has to be done before the end of nday Y etc.
But nowhere is it actually explained when ndays start and end, or even 
what and nday actually is.
What we have is just a number called nday that changes semi-regularly.

Peter thinks that what we have is enough, and I actually agree, but 
spelling it out is IMHO better

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss