Re: [s-d] [s-b] RFJ 0008 judgement

shadowfirebird on Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:53:19 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] RFJ 0008 judgement

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] RFJ 0008 judgement
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:53:16 +0000
In-reply-to: <200612121525.11413.comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <7b4a1ba30612120440w14c58147yeb77208feae1a0a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612120540g4d77bf4ep189a69f332dd647@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0DC5AB1A-4F1B-4A92-A6E1-DD620AADCC8A@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200612121525.11413.comexk@xxxxxxxxx>

> I submit a RFJ:
> {{
> The Statement contained in this RFJ is determined by its Judge.
> }}

Seems to me a lot rides on what you mean by "determined" ... and I for
one am not sure what you mean...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
  - From: Iain Scott
- Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
  - From: shadowfirebird
- Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] nweek 113 ballot
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] wtf
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread