Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement

Peter Cooper Jr. on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:43:52 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:43:48 -0500 (EST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <7b4a1ba30612120440w14c58147yeb77208feae1a0a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7b4a1ba30612120440w14c58147yeb77208feae1a0a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10 [CVS]

Iain Scott wrote:
> ACCEPT the RFJ.
> I understand this RFJ to be RFJ 008,  I hence rule this RFJ to be
> FALSE.

Note this was sent to -discuss.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
  - From: Iain Scott

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] RFJ 0008 judgement
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] RFJ 0008 judgement
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My first proposals of the New Era
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread