bd on Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:19:15 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> But I disagreed about the interpretation of the rules *about*
>> Proposals, Game Objects, etc.
> Well, then perhaps your RFJ should have been about that then.  It was
> about a proposal.  Sorry.  "The proposal titled..."

It's still a statement about the rules, since all game objects arise 
from the rules. I would argue that it's not strictly necessary to talk 
about the rules directly, as long as useful precedent can be made.
spoon-discuss mailing list