Re: [s-d] Proposal: you know you want 'em

["Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> I think it makes much more sense to make game actions implicitly
> performed in sequence.

Actions in a message are currently implicitly performed in
sequence. The question is more if you can make actions conditionally
dependent on prior actions doing what you thought/hoped they would,
and possibly on whether you can do conditional actions at all.

> But I think that game actions should be kept as simple as possible.

Well, Game Actions are a pretty fundamental part of the game, and the
game is bound to get complex... :)

> Or are we assuming that you have to be a programmer to play bnomic?
> That doesn't sound right.

There's a somewhat-surprisingly high correlation between programmers
and nomic players, it seems. But no, anyone with an interest in rules
that change rules should be able to play. :)

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss