Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

[bd <nomic@xxxxxxx>]

comex wrote:
> On 12/8/06, bd <nomic@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Surely we should start voiding props with low strength?
> No, becase the action we're ordering from high to low is voiding
> anything that conflicts with X.

Ah, I see. That works, I guess. I was thinking more of an approach where 
we try to minimize the number of votes 'cancelled', but I can see some 
cases now where this is superior.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss