bd on Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:15:07 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

comex wrote:
> On 12/8/06, bd <nomic@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Surely we should start voiding props with low strength?
> No, becase the action we're ordering from high to low is voiding
> anything that conflicts with X.

Ah, I see. That works, I guess. I was thinking more of an approach where 
we try to minimize the number of votes 'cancelled', but I can see some 
cases now where this is superior.
spoon-discuss mailing list