Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

comex on Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:53:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 18:53:04 -0500
In-reply-to: <4579EE23.3030709@xxxxxxx>
References: <200612072152.21048.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <9EC4FC22-D0D1-4672-A919-4DF01BE42131@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4578FB61.9090108@xxxxxxx> <200612081614.35861.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <4579EE23.3030709@xxxxxxx>

On 12/8/06, bd <nomic@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Surely we should start voiding props with low strength?
No, becase the action we're ordering from high to low is voiding
anything that conflicts with X.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: bd

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: Daniel Lepage
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: bd
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: bd

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread