Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

bd on Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:58:52 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
From: bd <nomic@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:58:43 -0500
In-reply-to: <200612081614.35861.comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200612072152.21048.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <9EC4FC22-D0D1-4672-A919-4DF01BE42131@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4578FB61.9090108@xxxxxxx> <200612081614.35861.comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)

comex wrote:

>> In descending order of Strength, and of Number in cases where Strength is
>> equal, if a Won Proposal Conflicts with any other Won Proposals, those
>> Proposals become Lost.

Surely we should start voiding props with low strength?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: comex

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: Daniel Lepage
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: bd

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread