Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule

Chuck Adams on Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:34:00 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
From: "Chuck Adams" <cja987@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:33:55 -0800
In-reply-to: <85ade64f0612081232o1c538f9ud0c4ef2df06c45e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <85ade64f0612081217jb81376djbddd8343a802b6d7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4579C8DF.1020709@xxxxxxx> <85ade64f0612081232o1c538f9ud0c4ef2df06c45e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 12/8/06, Chuck Adams <cja987@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> and having to break that mold though.

gads, again with the autopilot thinking, this time into a cliche.  I
meant "having to break that requirement explicitly".

//s
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
  - From: bd
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
  - From: Chuck Adams

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread