Re: [s-d] [s-b] And now for something completely different

shadowfirebird on Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:38:09 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] And now for something completely different

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] And now for something completely different
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:38:05 +0000
In-reply-to: <85ade64f0612051333h57df6f4dy8df69549b85b4dee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4573AC74.60109@xxxxxxx> <2f4350400612051304i2f37056fjadcfeca6603c6ebf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4575E225.8040809@xxxxxxx> <85ade64f0612051333h57df6f4dy8df69549b85b4dee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Something needs to unify Property and Attribute, or at least
> distinguish them.

Why not have two different rules that do similar things?  Might be interesting.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] And now for something completely different
  - From: shadowfirebird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] And now for something completely different
  - From: Chuck Adams

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] And now for something completely different
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] whither sproingie.player?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] And now for something completely different
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] And now for something completely different
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread