Jake Eakle on Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:01:12 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Slim Shady Clause

"eir names" should probably be "eir name", unless we can have two now. Also,
while the administrator could stop this, I think this technically allows
someone to change eir name from eir old name to multiple new names, since
recgnitions are probably (or could be) simultaneous, so the old name would
be the same in each case, and thus valid. This probably isn't a real issue


On 12/3/06, David E. Smith <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I propose the following:
> {{
> __The Slim Shady Clause__
> Append the following to Rule 1-4:
> {{
> A player may change eir names at any time, unless otherwise prohibited,
> by posting a message to a Public Forum, stating eir intent to do so, and
> clearly stating both eir "old" and "new" names. Such name changes take
> effect upon recognition by the Administrator.
> The Administrator may refuse to allow any External Force to become a
> player, and may refuse to recognize any otherwise-legal name change, if
> e believes the External Force's proposed name (or existing player's new
> name) would be ambiguous or confusing, or could otherwise damage the
> integrity of this game. The Administrator is encouraged, but not
> required, to state the reason for such refusal.
> }}
> }}
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
spoon-discuss mailing list