Re: [s-d] RFC: Rule Tag

[all players <nomic@xxxxxxx>]

Rainbow Wolfe wrote:
> loitering still... I would join but I'm due to leave again in a month and
> internet access is sparodic.
> 
> You could:
> {{create an RFC section for each rule [[and possibly each section?!]],
> add to this section [[whatever you define as]] key words that are defined /
> referred to by this rule}}
> {{create new_rule in RFC: if a word ceases to exist in a rule then the
> corresponding word in the RFC defined section of the rule becomes an invalid
> path and should be removed}}
> 
> note: 'should be removed' - invalid paths that aren't removed can then still
> be used. Safely if no one notices (possible but unlikely), or have penalties
> added if it noticed. Maybe penalties could be added to words and then
> players can try to remove the word from that rule to take advantage of an
> associated 'penalty'??
> 
> random suggestions...

Creating a seperate section guarentees that it won't be kept up-to-date :p

In any case, it's more fun to make it all implicit, then get into RFJs 
and/or Mobs when people disagree over whether a path is valid. Maybe 
even have a way to create paths...?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss