Re: [s-d] Judgement draft

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

Oooh.  Subtle.  Yes, I get that.

On 11/24/06, antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly what I intended to say.
>
> for now, if the Judgment draft were voted on as is and passed, yes, there's nothing to stop you from resubmitting the same RFJ over and over. But once it has been decided the first time, it guides interpretation, and so you cannot come up with a different answer, can you ?
> So all RFJs are final, I think...
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx" <shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 3:36:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-d] Judgement draft
>
> Well, then there IS an appeal process - you make a proposal.  I'm a
> newbie; don't ask me if it would work!  But you need to put the "all
> RFJs are final" in, I think...
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


-- 
It's Like This

Even the Samurai
Have teddy bears
And even the teddy bears
Get drunk
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss