Re: [s-d] Joining.

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 24, 2006, at 3:42 AM, shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Now +that+ should be in the rules.  Suber's rules have a clause that
> states the inverse, so I doubt that I'm the only player to be unsure
> about this.
>
> But I think I've made enough proposals for the n-week!

It's arguable whether Suber's rule actually says that. We had a  
similar "permissibility of the unprohibited" rule back at the  
beginning of the game, and after a fair bit of arguing and CFJs, the  
interpretation eventually settled down to meaning that anything not  
mentioned by the rules could be done, but anything that existed  
solely by the rules could only change according to the rules. Thus,  
if points are defined, then given myself 1000 points is implicitly  
regulated by the rules. Likewise, if I have a name, you can't change  
it unless the rules don't mention names. But you are allowed to  
change your clothes or surf the web, because those are beyond the  
game's domain.

As for "enough proposals for the n-week", we don't have a limit on  
this yet, but probably should.

-- 
Wonko


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss