Re: [s-d] Ding dong the witch is dead.

[Eugene Meidinger <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Could we have a Technical Admin and a Game Admin? Or are you just
referring to the technical aspect? I think it could be possible to make
things for the most part autonomous but we still need someone to fix
things when they go wrong.

As for setting up the pages I'd be happy to do that and try to figure
out some templateing so running things will be easier. Now it should be
clear that my ability to maintain focus on something in the long run is
limited but I can usually do a lot of work on something at the start.


On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:36 +0200, Antonio Dolcetta wrote:
> Daniel Lepage wrote:
> > In the time since the game stopped progressing, Real Life (tm) has  
> > consumed more and more of my time, so I'm not sure I could keep  
> > playing if we started again.
> > 
> > I do still have complete dumps of all the game data. These include  
> > the SQL tables, containing all versions of all rules, proposals, and  
> > CFJ/CFIs from before we switched to the wiki, and an enormous tar  
> > file containing the complete wiki, the complete older version of the  
> > wiki, all the relevant scripts, and a couple of unrelated files.
> > 
> > I could probably extract the current ruleset from this mess, if it  
> > would help.
> > 
> > 
> > In order to get going again, the following things need to happen:
> > 1. Somebody needs to volunteer to be Administrator.
> > 2. Somebody needs to get us some web space (Joel, is b.nomic.net  
> > still available?)
> > 3. The Administrator needs to install a wiki package (MediaWiki would  
> > be good) in said web space.
> > 4. The players need to set up all the relevant pages for the nomic.
> > 
> > So, does anyone want to be Admin?
> > 
> 
> Hello all
> I'd enjoy playing nomic again, but I don't really feel like being the 
> Admin. However if Joel cannot provide webspace, I could host bnomic on 
> my server, i don't have mediawiki yet, but i don't think installing it 
> will be much of a problem. As for point n°4 I think starting with a 
> reduced ruleset (just the core rules, no subgames etc) would be the best 
> option.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss