|
comex on Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:48:53 -0600 (CST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] comex submits p352
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] comex submits p352
- From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:48:48 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MZMyApVzerQrmUVGEbvgrKUUqFFroU9vz4eO3j6PYa5cdnGnF8diOxAmIihz/675khNQC3HmAa4B6NXEGI3ZBh4DGxHQbPFdkTG/eD1kPbSXEYTJjqsaQnj1tIswtMzKkm5tzQeupqzk8L4SzDrF+yfrNM8gRbtpD3Iap9VQWrk=
- In-reply-to: <410-22006152723247970@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <410-22006152723247970@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Being Not internally lit doesn't undo a lighting level of 1.
While it is Internally Lit, its lighting level is increased by one.
It is no longer increased by one when it is no longer internally lit
and thus it is back to zero (or whatever).
Is there a better way to phrase it?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss