[s-d] RE: [s-b] [auto] Wonko votes

[flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

> Motion 226/0: Accidental Nomic Word Enabling Explicitly Kaput. : Against
> I see no reason why words in comments shouldn't be Nomic Words. 

As the rules exist now, words in comments become Nomic words,
usable in prop titles and tiles plays which require Nomic words
for awarding purposes. My against vote doesn't necessarily preclude
passage.

> Motion 240/0: Consolidating Coinage Creates Canny Cache! : For
> Although I am FOR this, it also includes a major conceptual flaw.
>This is not Triller's fault - it's mine for not removing everything
>adequately. Basically, SP aren't Holdings in any way, shape or form,
>because you can never have a SP. Instead, it's a unit for measuring
>the value of a Soul. So you might have 250 SP worth of Souls, but
>you can't simply have 250 SP. It's just like how you can have 3
>gallons of water, but you can't just have 3 gallons.
> 
> This isn't a major problem because the Rules don't provide any way 
>for a player to ever gain SP, so it won't break the game; it's just 
>a confusing inconsistency in the rules.

Perhaps the solution is a proposal to eliminate SPs entirely,
and any basis on amplitude would necessarily follow.
Then the cost of talismans that require SP could simply be Souls.
A talisman that now requires 200SP to forge could simply
require 2 Souls to be bound to it.
Off hand I can't recall if any talismans require SPs for activating
their effects, so that might be problematic.

Triller



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss