[s-d] Re: [auto] Peter votes

[pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.)]

Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Leave it as a proposal - just declare it illegal and invalidate. Then it 
> exists (no-renumbering neccesary) and it now has a state as illegal and 
> historical.

Well, then you kind of have to half-recognize illegal actions, which
seems a bit odd to me. Maybe we'd need to have "proposal attempts",
which were numbered in order, but which only became "proposals" under
certain circumstances? (With something similar for other kinds of
game-changing objects?)

-- 
Peter C.
"Uncle Cosmo ... why do they call this a word processor?"
"It's simple, Skyler ... you've seen what food processors do to food, right?"
		-- MacNelley, "Shoe"
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss