Peter Cooper Jr. on Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:36:28 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [auto] Peter votes |
"Daniel Peter Lepage" <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm against letting the Minister of Change renumber props, because then e > gets the power to unilaterally decide which of a set of conflicting props > wins out. There's no renumbering; the number is assigned when it's created. I was trying to solve the problem of needing to renumber everything if a prop. submission is found to be illegal. This happened a couple nweeks ago, and it looks like more props-per-nweek changes could be on the way (such as Wonko's class system), so it'd be nice if we could somehow count illegal actions as taking up a serial number even though there isn't actually a prop there. My solution was to allow the minister to give out numbers (presumably though the automated script), so that if one particular action was found illegal, the number could just be deleted and ignored. I'm certainly open to other possibilities, though, if someone has a suggestion. -- Peter C. "What does that mean?" "It doesn't really mean anything, but it sounds neat." _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss