Alex Truelsen on Sat, 11 Jun 2005 19:02:14 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: Tweak Update

On 6/11/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Tweak #11 *did* actually get seconded. I forwarded the message to 
> business
> > after you took note that it had gone to discuss. You even replied to the
> > additional message at the top. Does this mean forwards are not 
> recognised,
> > even if they go to business? Although I can see how forwards could cause
> > much confusion in this manner.
> At the very least, it makes it easier for me to miss. But I can't see
> a reason not to recognize it. So, Tweak #11 did in fact pass after
> all.
> It makes Rule 9-8/5, meaning that p98 actually made r9-8/6 and p110
> actually made r9-8/7.
> Banker, take note of the additional Genechips from both the tweak
> passing and that the rules were slightly different at the start of
> nweek 91.

And I just had everything figured out...

> Peter C.
> "Did the table do something wrong?"
> -- Troi, "Birthright, Part 1", Star Trek, The Next Generation
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
spoon-discuss mailing list