Rainbow Wolfe on Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:41:02 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: Tweak Update

Sorry to be awkward. :)

- RW

On 6/11/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Tweak #11 *did* actually get seconded. I forwarded the message to 
> business
> > after you took note that it had gone to discuss. You even replied to the
> > additional message at the top. Does this mean forwards are not 
> recognised,
> > even if they go to business? Although I can see how forwards could cause
> > much confusion in this manner.
> At the very least, it makes it easier for me to miss. But I can't see
> a reason not to recognize it. So, Tweak #11 did in fact pass after
> all.
> It makes Rule 9-8/5, meaning that p98 actually made r9-8/6 and p110
> actually made r9-8/7.
> Banker, take note of the additional Genechips from both the tweak
> passing and that the rules were slightly different at the start of
> nweek 91.
> --
> Peter C.
> "Did the table do something wrong?"
> -- Troi, "Birthright, Part 1", Star Trek, The Next Generation
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

The wonderful thing about email is, you can spend hours crafting and finely 
tuning your sarcasm and wit for that perfect retort, only to have it appear 
completely and utterly ignored.
spoon-discuss mailing list