Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] RainbowWolfe submits p102

[Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> >
> > heeey! No one complained last time - most of this wording was ripped 
> from
> > the previous version. This part especially - I just combined all the
> > 'hiding
> > under a rock' bits in one place. :P
> 
> 
> I figure if everyone and their Pomeranian can kvetch at me when I rip off
> old rules, I can do it to other people. Besides, I know there were a lot 
> of
> little problems with the old ruleset.
> 
> [[BvS]]



Yeah. That's partly why we started again, to save tidying up the old rules 
set. This way we create new and interesting problems with a different 
ruleset - the old problems were just too familiar. :D

Maybe (y'know - as a subgame) we should bring back the old rules as a 
revisable document and tidy them up? Then we can argue over the logic of a 
rules set we're not actually using... except that we would be in a self 
referential kind of way. :S

- RW
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss