eugman on Mon, 23 May 2005 14:14:51 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Wonko submits p98-101 |
> Proposal 98/0: Don't Encourage Unneccesary CFI Emissions > A Standard Proposal by Wonko > Last modified on nweek 89, nday 7 > > Remove the text "If a CFI is judged TRUE, the player who submitted it recieves > 20 Genechips." from r9-8. Totally needed. I think everyone should vote refused on the cfi against me so that Raelus doesn't get rewarded for an uneeded cfi. > Proposal 99/0: All Gambling Is Not Good > A Standard Proposal by Wonko > Last modified on nweek 89, nday 7 > > Remove section eight, > (the one titled 'Casinos') > >From the book "Ruleset". > > [[ > Nobody's ever made a Casino, and we now have too many other subgames to justify > keeping this around. > ]] Yep you're right. You may wish to alter the ministry of gambly. > Proposal 100/0: More Zapping > A Standard Proposal by Wonko > Last modified on nweek 89, nday 7 > > Replace the second bullet point in rule 6-5 (Tiles:Playing) with: > {{ > * Zapping up to three Zones. A Zone may only be Zapped if it contains at least > one Tile and has not had any new Tiles added to it for at least 10 ndays. When a > player Zaps a Zone, e gains amplitude equal to half the number of tiles in that > Zone, rounded down. If a player controls that Zone, then that player gains > Amplitude equal to the number of Tiles in the Zone times n, where n is one plus > the number of Runes in that Zone. Then the Zone becomes uncontrolled, and all > Tiles in it are put in the Bag. > }} > > [[ > I think Tiles would be more playable if we weren't sitting around waiting for > free Zones so much. This fixes that by allowing us to Zap three Zones at once, > and rewarding players who Zap Zones. > ]] Sounds good. Should I join? I'm not to good at scrabble and I propobably won't be buying any talismans to help me.(I can't hold sp currently as things are) > Proposal 101/0: Small Changes > A Standard Proposal by Wonko > Last modified on nweek 89, nday 7 > > In rule 3-4 of the Ruleset, replace "When a Proposal changes from Open to > Historical, each player who cast a vote on it gains 1A." with "When a Proposal > changes from Open to Historical, each player who cast a vote of FOR or AGAINST > on it gains 1A." > > In rule 7-6 of the Ruleset, replace "three times" with "five times" wherever it > occurs (raising the SP burning point). > > Repeal r9-5 of the Ruleset. [[Bounties - again something that's never been used > and doesn't seem very useful. ]] How about this, I make more changes to my prop related to bounties and you put ina clause that if it fails you repeal the rule. This way If i can make bounties useful then they stay. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss