eugman on Sun, 22 May 2005 14:47:56 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Wonko votes


Ahhh. Thanks for clearing both of those up.


> 
> On May 22, 2005, at 3.34 PM, eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > The party line of HIP is as follows:
> > Proposal 91/1: The Baron's Story, Chapter Two: Speeders Return (BvS)
> > Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos? (BvS)
> > We're for these. The first brings back Speeders, the second brings back
> > the much-loved Default Case and thus makes this message legal.
> >
> >> Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos?        : For
> >> This doesn't break the game because it doesn't permit anything that 
> >> isn't
> >> already permitted. It could be said to "permit" calvinball, inasmuch 
> >> as anything
> >> else that doesn't forbid it is implicitly permitting it; this doesn't 
> >> change the
> >> game at all. Go ahead, slap me with a herring. See if I care.
> >
> > Ok so I ge that it doesn't break the game but I am still unable to 
> > grasp the usefulness of this prop.
> 
> One could argue that if only actions permitted by the rules are legal, 
> then we can't use the wiki, because nothing in the ruleset mentions the 
> wiki. One could also argue that I shouldn't be able to write this 
> message - after all, where in the rules does it permit us to discuss?
> 
> This rule just makes it abundantly clear that if the rules don't talk 
> about something at all, then the game doesn't care about it.
> 
> > Also why do we have people posting the party stance instead of of the 
> > members of a party subscribing to the party page to be emailed the new 
> > info? Why would I want to know what a differen't party supports?
> 
> The rules say " [[It is requested but not required that Party Chairs 
> post their Party Line in a public forum.]]"
> 
> I took that as a sign that people wanted to know.
> 
> -- 
> Wonko
> 
> If you try and take a cat apart to see how it works, the first thing 
> you have on your hands is a non-working cat.
>     -- Douglas Adams
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss