Rainbow Wolfe on Sun, 22 May 2005 14:55:03 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Wonko votes |
I like to know what a party stance is... I don't really care, so I'm not gonna look it up - but a random message may prompt me. I think of it as political campaigning. - Rainbow Wolfe On 5/22/05, eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ahhh. Thanks for clearing both of those up. > > > > > > On May 22, 2005, at 3.34 PM, eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > The party line of HIP is as follows: > > > Proposal 91/1: The Baron's Story, Chapter Two: Speeders Return (BvS) > > > Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos? (BvS) > > > We're for these. The first brings back Speeders, the second brings > back > > > the much-loved Default Case and thus makes this message legal. > > > > > >> Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos? : For > > >> This doesn't break the game because it doesn't permit anything that > > >> isn't > > >> already permitted. It could be said to "permit" calvinball, inasmuch > > >> as anything > > >> else that doesn't forbid it is implicitly permitting it; this doesn't > > >> change the > > >> game at all. Go ahead, slap me with a herring. See if I care. > > > > > > Ok so I ge that it doesn't break the game but I am still unable to > > > grasp the usefulness of this prop. > > > > One could argue that if only actions permitted by the rules are legal, > > then we can't use the wiki, because nothing in the ruleset mentions the > > wiki. One could also argue that I shouldn't be able to write this > > message - after all, where in the rules does it permit us to discuss? > > > > This rule just makes it abundantly clear that if the rules don't talk > > about something at all, then the game doesn't care about it. > > > > > Also why do we have people posting the party stance instead of of the > > > members of a party subscribing to the party page to be emailed the new > > > info? Why would I want to know what a differen't party supports? > > > > The rules say " [[It is requested but not required that Party Chairs > > post their Party Line in a public forum.]]" > > > > I took that as a sign that people wanted to know. > > > > -- > > Wonko > > > > If you try and take a cat apart to see how it works, the first thing > > you have on your hands is a non-working cat. > > -- Douglas Adams > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss