[s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: [auto] EugeneMeidinger amends p63

[eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Actually 4-5 should be updated or I should be less a genechip. Maybe you should check all of my proposals. I think the only one that passed was the talisman one...


> eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx (Eugene) writes:
> > pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.) writes:
> >> Nope. The renaming of Gambly was a part of proposal 32, which failed.
> > 
> > Then 
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-business/spoon-business-200505/msg00137.
> html
> > has me very confused.
> > So I shouldn't have 4 genechips right now?
> 
> Hmm. Yes, it does look like I made an error there. Proposal 32
> definitely failed.
> <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-discuss/spoon-discuss-200505/msg00139.h
> tml>
> 
> So, yes, you should have one less genechip. Display updated. My
> apologies, and thank you for bringing it up.
> 
> With the zillion changes every nweek, I'm bound to miss some things
> here and there. Please feel free to double-check my work and make sure
> I'm not accidentally breaking the rules.
> 
> -- 
> Peter C.
> "Never eat more than you can lift."
> 		-- Miss Piggy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss