Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] Peter submits p74

[Raelus <raelusaetherira@xxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:

> Alex Truelsen <dichotomousmind@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>  
>
> > I can't tell. Are you trying to actually bribe us, get us to pass this by 
> > unanimous dissent, or trying to get the Voice to waste a veto?
> >    
>
> Whichever works. :)
>
> It's partly an experiment to see how organized everyone can be to have
> one person vote for it and others against. It's partly because I
> hadn't yet figured out what I wanted to do with my 5th proposal.
>
> But if people starting looking like they're getting all organized,
> I'll probably amend it to something else. I was thinking of trying to
> add transaction support, such that if a sequence of actions was not
> what one intended, one could cause none of it to happen if desired.
> But it'd involve adding a kind of optional scripting language to
> public forum posts, and I don't know if they'd be any interest in
> it. Is there?
>
>  
Might I recommend creating a card named after yourself? I don't want to 
develop ALL the ideas for the game, after all, I'm not even allowed to 
play, as Dealer.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss