[s-d] Re: [auto] Peter submits p74

[pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.)]

Alex Truelsen <dichotomousmind@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I can't tell. Are you trying to actually bribe us, get us to pass this by 
> unanimous dissent, or trying to get the Voice to waste a veto?

Whichever works. :)

It's partly an experiment to see how organized everyone can be to have
one person vote for it and others against. It's partly because I
hadn't yet figured out what I wanted to do with my 5th proposal.

But if people starting looking like they're getting all organized,
I'll probably amend it to something else. I was thinking of trying to
add transaction support, such that if a sequence of actions was not
what one intended, one could cause none of it to happen if desired.
But it'd involve adding a kind of optional scripting language to
public forum posts, and I don't know if they'd be any interest in
it. Is there?

-- 
Peter C.
"Data! That was *not* funny!"
		-- Geordi, Star Trek: Generations

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss