Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] Raelus amends p40

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 5, 2005, at 11.07 PM, Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:

> eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > Aren't you normally supposed to have a name in == rulename == or
> > something like that to show the rule has a name?
>
> That seems to be the convention (it used to be surrounded by _, but
> the current rules database (the wiki) uses equal signs for headers, so
> I've been using that).
>
> However, the rules don't recognize the need for rules (nor proposals
> for that matter) to have names or titles at all. Nor do they define
> what that would mean. Which is kind of interesting, seeing as there
> are rules referencing the titles of things.

Well, it's implicitly defined by the context, since all props go 
through the prop scripts which have a 'title' field; theoretically, if 
I added arbitrary other fields, they could be referenced and everyone 
would know what the words meant. But yeah, it might be a good idea to 
put it officially in the rules.

--
Wonko

Your food stamps will be stopped effective March 1992  because we 
received notice that you passed away. May God bless you. You may 
reapply if there is a change in your  circumstances.
  ---Department of Social Services,  Greenville, South Carolina

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss