[s-d] Re: [auto] Raelus amends p40

[pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.)]

eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Aren't you normally supposed to have a name in == rulename == or
> something like that to show the rule has a name?

That seems to be the convention (it used to be surrounded by _, but
the current rules database (the wiki) uses equal signs for headers, so
I've been using that).

However, the rules don't recognize the need for rules (nor proposals
for that matter) to have names or titles at all. Nor do they define
what that would mean. Which is kind of interesting, seeing as there
are rules referencing the titles of things.

-- 
Peter C.
"The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't."
		-- Douglas Adams

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss